The Health Curve

The Health Curve is a blog I created to keep track of news in health economics and policy. Here's how it works: I bring the articles and sprinkle in my opinions. You bring your interested mind and thought provoking comments. Enjoy.

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Healthcare Spending & End of Life Care

In August, 60 Minutes did a segment on end of life care and how much it costs the U.S. health care system each year. Although the video is from August, the issue it covers is still relevant today. This is a huge issue that comes with a gigantic moral debate attached to it.



The segment presents some staggering stats:

  • U.S. spends 55 billion dollars a year  on hospital bills in the last 2 months of patients lives. This 55 billion  trumps both the annual budget for The Department of Homeland Security and The Department of Education. It is estimated that 20-30 percent of these procedures have no meaningful impact on the patient.
  • One day in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) costs over 10,000 dollars. 18-20 percent of Americans spend their last days in an ICU
  • While a majority of Americans prefer to die at home, 75 percent die in hospitals & nursing homes.
  • The government or private insurance pays for 85 percent of these medical costs
What are the underlying issues?
  1. Medical technology has become so good that if patients want to, they can be kept alive much longer with advanced procedures and machines. The problem is, this is very expensive.
  2. The U.S. health care system is built so that supply drives demand. This means that doctors are in control of the kind of medical care you demand because they suggest it. If the doctor suggests a certain treatment chances are you will demand that treatment. Doctors get paid by the patients they see and the tests & procedures they do so their incentive is to provide as much care as possible. This is also expensive.
  3. Patients often never even see the medical bills they rack up because the government & insurance pays them. If they aren't paying nobody really cares how much these procedures cost.
It was amazing to hear the word "bankruptcy" brought up several times throughout the video. But that's how big of an issue this is; it can eventually bankrupt the United States. The problem is the huge moral debate. We can't just stop caring for people when they begin to die but at the same time a huge amount of money is being spent on this. Is there a moral middle ground or a way around this issue? Should end of life care be rationed or capped at a certain amount? It's a really hard debate to have.

3 comments:

  1. Definitely a tough conversation to have... doctor wants to be honest with the patient but can't really ask them to "let go" because it will save America money...

    ReplyDelete
  2. sorry to be so "cold" , but if medical technology can prolong life, then it's up to medical technology to focus the patient, and keep the conversations above board. I just don't think there is enough facts entering the equation on life's ending chances as there are on life sustaining chances. I'm not saying remove the choice for patient and family, I'm saying put a system in place to focus the choices for the patient. It's a hard choice, yes, but maybe easier if the practitioners take a more center role.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You make a good point. Especially since the video mentions that a majority of Americans would prefer to die at home without all of the extra expensive care. I feel that many patients just aren't educated about the options. If they were i feel many more would choose care that does not prolong life.

    ReplyDelete